(Part 2 in the series on ID bridging. See the first post here. For a refresher, we are picking up from the last post and discussing how to remove the short-sighted and fraudulent practices out of the adtech stack.)
For a buyer to evaluate the effectiveness of a campaign, they need to assess whether the different elements that built up that campaign work. These include creative, frequency caps, targeting criteria, and others. However, if 20% of IDX IDs are different users from different browsers within the same household or simply picked as the most valuable ID, the ability to predict and optimize performance isn’t just compromised; it is lost. While individual publishers, tech companies, or other intermediaries might show some short-term uplift, it's built on the back of fraud. It will destroy the credibility of the open web, sending even more of the budget into the safe hands of Google and Facebook.
These deceptive practices were first called out a little over a year ago and continue to spread, tarnishing the industry's reputation. Some SSPs (Sell-Side Platforms) have been caught overwriting user IDs based on bidding parameters, further distorting the process. Companies lure publishers with promises of increased revenue, but these gains are built on deception. Finally, as we have seen over the last few weeks, individual companies are getting called out and will be punished by the market. That is great, but it remains unclear where along the value chain this fraud is occurring. It could originate from the publisher, a data partner, an SSP, or almost anywhere the bid request is touched.
The continued use of ID Bridging could have severe long-term consequences for the programmatic advertising industry:
Make no mistake: ID Bridging is a dead end for everyone. The programmatic advertising industry needs solutions prioritizing transparency, user trust, and responsible data practices.
But the solution is quite simple—enforce and follow the rules. In the example above, you have rules from PreBid and Terms of Service from the ID companies, SSPs, and DSPs, so ID Bridging is violating those Terms of Service and is fraud.
GrowthCode provides ID management services as part of its core service of helping advertising stakeholders build and leverage first-party data and identity graphs. Along with other reputable companies in the industry, GrowthCode is trying to expand the number of UIDs used in every bid request, thereby providing the maximum signal strength for publishers and, in turn, delivering the best fidelity to the buy-side to identify and optimize against the right audience. All that is required is an engagement with the different UI ID companies, understanding the terms of service, and following those terms. GrowthCode delivers its services in the clear light of day in prebid so all operators can see what's happening (we also offer the same service server-to-server for those that opt for this option).
GrowthCode promotes responsible ID management and helps publishers and advertisers leverage first-party data. We advocate for industry collaboration to build a future based on transparency and trust.